<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are All Americans Illegal Aliens?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edwards.org/2006/03/26/all-americans-are-illegal-aliens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edwards.org/2006/03/26/all-americans-are-illegal-aliens/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lopo</title>
		<link>http://edwards.org/2006/03/26/all-americans-are-illegal-aliens/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Lopo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwards.org/2006/03/26/all-americans-are-illegal-aliens/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>@ Emily

The Ends NEVER justify the means. 

Iraque is an actual proof of that and the Israelian attack to Lebanon is the upmost actual demonstation of that. Actaully, in the recent history of the USA around the globe this is demonstrated at will.

@ Impulse

You are partially right but not for that reason.

@ Author

Do you know why &lt;a title="Requirement of model and short term of protection" href="http://www.historical-markers.org/usptohistory.cgi" rel="nofollow"&gt;Patent&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_copyright_law" rel="nofollow"&gt;Copyright&lt;/a&gt; were invented? And what was the &lt;a title="Fair Use and short theme protection of rights" href="http://negativland.com/intprop.html#copyright" rel="nofollow"&gt;return to people&lt;/a&gt; due to that? And what was the ideia behind that lost of our Rights?

Of course, if the Rights of the People are endagered the Patents and Copyrights should be immediately revoged. They have it in the first place to promote science and culture but not to make then filfy rich and/or explore the People.

This is valid for software, healthcare, agriculture, etc.

Today, the original concept of Patent and Copyright was totaly destroyed. Nor the authors really have their Copyright but the companies that publish the work (the intention was precisely the opposite) neither Patents protect work done but start to protect mere ideas, and many of those not even original.

Maybe its time to rethink this model from scratch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Emily</p>
<p>The Ends NEVER justify the means. </p>
<p>Iraque is an actual proof of that and the Israelian attack to Lebanon is the upmost actual demonstation of that. Actaully, in the recent history of the USA around the globe this is demonstrated at will.</p>
<p>@ Impulse</p>
<p>You are partially right but not for that reason.</p>
<p>@ Author</p>
<p>Do you know why <a title="Requirement of model and short term of protection" href="http://www.historical-markers.org/usptohistory.cgi" rel="nofollow">Patent</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_copyright_law" rel="nofollow">Copyright</a> were invented? And what was the <a title="Fair Use and short theme protection of rights" href="http://negativland.com/intprop.html#copyright" rel="nofollow">return to people</a> due to that? And what was the ideia behind that lost of our Rights?</p>
<p>Of course, if the Rights of the People are endagered the Patents and Copyrights should be immediately revoged. They have it in the first place to promote science and culture but not to make then filfy rich and/or explore the People.</p>
<p>This is valid for software, healthcare, agriculture, etc.</p>
<p>Today, the original concept of Patent and Copyright was totaly destroyed. Nor the authors really have their Copyright but the companies that publish the work (the intention was precisely the opposite) neither Patents protect work done but start to protect mere ideas, and many of those not even original.</p>
<p>Maybe its time to rethink this model from scratch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: impulse</title>
		<link>http://edwards.org/2006/03/26/all-americans-are-illegal-aliens/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>impulse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 09:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwards.org/2006/03/26/all-americans-are-illegal-aliens/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Both were wrong, but I would have done the same as the husband. I think there is no good or bad, only protection of resources. 

This drugstory reminds me of the eleven South American countries who forced the American producers of AIDS stopping medicin to sell them cheaper, zo more people could be saved.

source: http://www.paho.org/english/ad/fch/ai/antiretrovirals_HP.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both were wrong, but I would have done the same as the husband. I think there is no good or bad, only protection of resources. </p>
<p>This drugstory reminds me of the eleven South American countries who forced the American producers of AIDS stopping medicin to sell them cheaper, zo more people could be saved.</p>
<p>source: <a href="http://www.paho.org/english/ad/fch/ai/antiretrovirals_HP.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.paho.org/english/ad/fch/ai/antiretrovirals_HP.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://edwards.org/2006/03/26/all-americans-are-illegal-aliens/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 13:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwards.org/2006/03/26/all-americans-are-illegal-aliens/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Sometimes the end does justify the means. They were both wrong in this case, though. The druggist for not being compassionate and willing to forego profit to help someone in dire need, and the husband for stealing. BUT, at least the husband did all he could to help his wife, so he was morally right and sometimes that's more important than the law. I think I would do the same... take my chances on a jury being more compassionate than the money-grubbing pharmacist, and being able to sleep at night knowing I had done everything I could to help my dying spouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the end does justify the means. They were both wrong in this case, though. The druggist for not being compassionate and willing to forego profit to help someone in dire need, and the husband for stealing. BUT, at least the husband did all he could to help his wife, so he was morally right and sometimes that&#8217;s more important than the law. I think I would do the same&#8230; take my chances on a jury being more compassionate than the money-grubbing pharmacist, and being able to sleep at night knowing I had done everything I could to help my dying spouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
